Dear world,
Sometimes I wonder how people get better at doing things. I would like to be good at stringing words together, making it sound so convincing and more importantly, look awesome while at it. A lot of times I have ideas in my head during meetings but I always potray it to the world in its worst possible way. Here's an example today.
So there I was at a meeting. We're having a good discussion. Suddenly, a question pops out - have I done this 'thing' in the project. A simple answer to a simple question - yes. Sadly, that was how I replied it - YES and muttered a few lines. It killed the conversation on the spot and didn't show the extend of work I did. The ideas behind my work and thought process that went about doing it was lost with a simple yes. I didn't follow up and it killed my chances to look 'smart'.
So here I am pondering on how to improve on this. Perhaps I should cut out the obvious answer of YES and instead go about talking about the process and ideas first and THEN saying YES. I have a feeling my thought process is revolved around the fact that 'Beating around the bush' is utterly nonsense. In fact, it isnt. People tend to stigmatised 'beating around the bush' as a negative way of doing things because of how pointless it is. However, I strongly believe that beating around the bush is the best way of convincing people. If only I can think of words in my head as good as I write. To do it during a meeting requires skill and a whole lot of concentration and that is what I am hoping to achieve.
Beating around the bush is the way to go.
Sometimes I wonder how people get better at doing things. I would like to be good at stringing words together, making it sound so convincing and more importantly, look awesome while at it. A lot of times I have ideas in my head during meetings but I always potray it to the world in its worst possible way. Here's an example today.
So there I was at a meeting. We're having a good discussion. Suddenly, a question pops out - have I done this 'thing' in the project. A simple answer to a simple question - yes. Sadly, that was how I replied it - YES and muttered a few lines. It killed the conversation on the spot and didn't show the extend of work I did. The ideas behind my work and thought process that went about doing it was lost with a simple yes. I didn't follow up and it killed my chances to look 'smart'.
So here I am pondering on how to improve on this. Perhaps I should cut out the obvious answer of YES and instead go about talking about the process and ideas first and THEN saying YES. I have a feeling my thought process is revolved around the fact that 'Beating around the bush' is utterly nonsense. In fact, it isnt. People tend to stigmatised 'beating around the bush' as a negative way of doing things because of how pointless it is. However, I strongly believe that beating around the bush is the best way of convincing people. If only I can think of words in my head as good as I write. To do it during a meeting requires skill and a whole lot of concentration and that is what I am hoping to achieve.
Beating around the bush is the way to go.
Zukri